FYNQRCM
Case Studies

Representative recovery scenarios

What FYNQ RCM's methodology produces in three common practice profiles. Real client case studies will appear here as engagements complete.

Behavioral HealthScenario 01

8-provider behavioral group with high telehealth mix

The challenge

  • ~62% telehealth visit mix across providers
  • Prior-auth denials averaging ~14% of claims
  • Time-based code under-utilization (90834 logged where 90837 was earned)

Our approach

  • Centralized prior-auth tracking across the full provider roster
  • Place-of-service and modifier rule engine updated weekly per payer
  • Documentation-based review for 90834 → 90837 promotions

Expected outcome

Industry-typical recovery for this scenario profile: 8–14% lift in net collections within 90 days, primarily from reduced authorization denials and accurate time-based coding.

Family PracticeScenario 02

14-provider primary care group with uncaptured CCM revenue

The challenge

  • Chronic care management (CCM) revenue largely uncaptured
  • Inconsistent E/M leveling across providers
  • Aging A/R past 90 days representing >18% of total balance

Our approach

  • Annual Wellness Visit and CCM capture program build-out
  • E/M leveling support based on documentation, with provider-level scorecards
  • Structured A/R recovery worklist by aging bucket and payer

Expected outcome

Industry-typical recovery for this scenario profile: 6–10% lift in net collections within 120 days, with CCM contributing a recurring monthly revenue stream the group wasn't billing before.

CardiologyScenario 03

11-provider cardiology group with high-dollar denials

The challenge

  • Bundling and modifier errors on procedure + same-day E/M
  • Slow follow-up on $5K+ catheterization claims
  • Device interrogation coding inconsistencies

Our approach

  • Specialty-trained coders reviewing every high-dollar claim before submission
  • Aggressive high-dollar denial appeals workflow with dedicated turnaround SLAs
  • Device interrogation coding standardized across the group

Expected outcome

Industry-typical recovery for this scenario profile: 9–13% lift in net collections within 180 days, weighted toward fewer write-offs on procedure claims.

About these scenarios

The recovery ranges above are drawn from published industry benchmarks (MGMA, HFMA, AMA practice management reports) for the relevant specialties, group sizes, and conditions described. They illustrate the kind of result our methodology is designed to produce — not specific client engagements. Once we have completed client engagements with attributable outcomes, this page will be replaced with real case studies, with client permission and any required identifiers anonymized. Talk to us about what a recovery scenario for your group could look like.

See what enterprise-grade RCM can recover for your group.

We'll review your current performance against industry benchmarks and show you exactly where the revenue is leaking.

Schedule a Consultation